Radeon R7 260X
VS
FirePro V7000

Radeon R7 260X vs FirePro V7000

AMD

Radeon R7 260X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz
VS

FirePro V7000

2012Core: 950 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7000

#102
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500
91%
#103
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
84%
#104
Radeon Pro W6900X
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000
82%
#105
Quadro RTX 6000
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800
81%
#228
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
4197%
#243
FirePro V7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $100
100%
#244
Quadro P500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
94%
#246
FireStream 9370
MSRP: $800|Avg: $50
90%
#247
GRID K260Q
MSRP: $937|Avg: $15
89%
#249
Quadro 600
MSRP: $179|Avg: $20
83%
#251
Quadro 410
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
82%
#253
FirePro W600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $30
80%
#254
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
78%
#255
FirePro W8100
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200
78%
#256
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
78%
#257
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
76%
#258
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 260X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V7000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R7 260XFirePro V7000
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro V7000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V7000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $150), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 48.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 260XFirePro V7000
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+48.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)
More affordable ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 260X and FirePro V7000

AMD

Radeon R7 260X

The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.

AMD

FirePro V7000

The FirePro V7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points. Launch price was $1,249.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 260X scores 3,198 and the FirePro V7000 reaches 3,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 260X is built on GCN 2.0 while the FirePro V7000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7000). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro V7000).

FeatureRadeon R7 260XFirePro V7000
G3D Mark Score
3,198+1%
3,162
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896
1280+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.971 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS+23%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
56
80+43%
L1 Cache
224 KB
320 KB+43%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 260XFirePro V7000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 260X comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V7000 has 4 GB. The FirePro V7000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 260X) vs 512 KB (FirePro V7000) — the FirePro V7000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 260XFirePro V7000
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 260X) vs 12 (FirePro V7000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon R7 260XFirePro V7000
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6
6
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 260X) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro V7000). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 260X) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7000).

FeatureRadeon R7 260XFirePro V7000
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 260X draws 115W versus the FirePro V7000's 150W — a 26.4% difference. The Radeon R7 260X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R7 260X) vs 350W (FirePro V7000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon R7 260XFirePro V7000
TDP
115W-23%
150W
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
242mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
80
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
27.8+32%
21.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 260X launched at $139 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the FirePro V7000 launched at $899 and now averages $100. The FirePro V7000 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.3 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 31.6 (FirePro V7000) — the FirePro V7000 offers 48.4% better value. The Radeon R7 260X is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon R7 260XFirePro V7000
MSRP
$139-85%
$899
Avg Price (30d)
$150
$100-33%
Performance per Dollar
21.3
31.6+48%
Codename
Bonaire
Pitcairn
Release
October 8 2013
August 27 2012
Ranking
#568
#462