Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon Pro 555

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 260X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 555.

Insight	Radeon R7 260X	Radeon Pro 555
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 260X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 260X holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $1,000), it costs 85% less, resulting in a 578.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R7 260X	Radeon Pro 555
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+578.8%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($150)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 260X Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 555 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 260X and Radeon Pro 555

Radeon R7 260X

The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.

Radeon Pro 555

The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 260X scores 3,198 and the Radeon Pro 555 reaches 3,141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 260X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 555 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 555). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555).

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Radeon Pro 555
G3D Mark Score	3,198+2%	3,141
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896+17%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.971 TFLOPS+51%	1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	56+17%	48
L1 Cache	224 KB+17%	192 KB
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Radeon Pro 555
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260X) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) — the Radeon Pro 555 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Radeon Pro 555
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 260X draws 115W versus the Radeon Pro 555's 75W — a 42.1% difference. The Radeon Pro 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R7 260X) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 555). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R7 260X	Radeon Pro 555
TDP	115W	75W-35%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	170mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	27.8	41.9+51%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 260X launched at $139 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0 and now averages $1000. The Radeon R7 260X costs 85% less ($850 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.3 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 3.1 (Radeon Pro 555) — the Radeon R7 260X offers 587.1% better value. The Radeon Pro 555 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).