
Radeon R9 270X vs FirePro S9050

Radeon R9 270X
Popular choices:

FirePro S9050
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9050
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S9050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 270X.
| Insight | Radeon R9 270X | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 270X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 270X holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $1,825), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 4437.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 270X | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4437.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,825) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 270X and FirePro S9050

Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.

FirePro S9050
The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 270X scores 4,874 and the FirePro S9050 reaches 4,901 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270X is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro S9050 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 1,792 (FirePro S9050). Raw compute: 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,874 | 4,901 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1792+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.688 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+20% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 448 KB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R9 270X) vs 768 KB (FirePro S9050) — the FirePro S9050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270X) vs 12 (FirePro S9050). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270X) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 270X) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 270X draws 180W versus the FirePro S9050's 225W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon R9 270X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 270X) vs 350W (FirePro S9050). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 254mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 C vs 90°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-20% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 254mm |
| Height | 109mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 C-11% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 27.1+24% | 21.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 270X launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 and now averages $1825. The Radeon R9 270X costs 97.8% less ($1785 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 121.8 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 2.7 (FirePro S9050) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 4411.1% better value. The FirePro S9050 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-90% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-98% | $1825 |
| Performance per Dollar | 121.8+4411% | 2.7 |
| Codename | Curacao | Tahiti |
| Release | October 8 2013 | August 7 2014 |
| Ranking | #448 | #446 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















