Radeon R9 M280X
VS
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Radeon R9 M280X vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

AMD

Radeon R9 M280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

2021Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M280X is positioned at rank #285 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M280X

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2225%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2138%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2113%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2109%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2105%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2093%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2067%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2059%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2040%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2034%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2010%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2006%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1969%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1968%
#270
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2454%
#285
Radeon R9 M280X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
100%
#286
Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $83|Avg: $83
99%
#287
GeForce GT 220
MSRP: $69|Avg: $49
99%
#288
Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
95%
#290
GeForce G210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
91%
#291
Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
87%
#292
Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $9
83%
#293
GeForce GTX 260
MSRP: $449|Avg: $449
82%
#294
Radeon HD 8490
MSRP: $99|Avg: $35
82%
#295
Radeon HD 8650D
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
81%
#297
Radeon HDG 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $15
78%
#298
Radeon HD 3870
MSRP: $219|Avg: $15
77%
#299
Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
75%
#300
Radeon HD 6310
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
75%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M280X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H).

InsightRadeon R9 M280XUHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 M280X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M280X and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

AMD

Radeon R9 M280X

The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M280X scores 814 and the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) reaches 800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 M280XUHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G3D Mark Score
814+2%
800
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Gen. 12
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
2048+12700%
16
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1450 MHz+45%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M280XUHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M280X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 M280X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureRadeon R9 M280XUHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M280X draws 200W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 172.1% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M280X) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.

FeatureRadeon R9 M280XUHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
TDP
200W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
Mobile
Integrated
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
4.1
53.3+1200%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R9 M280XUHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
MSRP
$250
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
16.3
Infinity
Codename
Tahiti
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
October 8 2013
March 30 2021
Ranking
#404
#917