Radeon RX 6300M vs Arc A380
Radeon RX 6300M
Popular choices:
Arc A380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 6300M is positioned at rank #98 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300M
Performance Per Dollar Arc A380
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A380 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6300M | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300M and Arc A380
Radeon RX 6300M
The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.
Arc A380
The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6300M scores 6,421 and the Arc A380 reaches 6,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6300M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Arc A380 uses Generation 12.7, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 1,024 (Arc A380). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2050 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 8 (Arc A380) vs 128.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,421+2% | 6,301 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1024+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.686 TFLOPS | 4.198 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+17% | 2050 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 12+50% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A380 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6300M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A380 has 6 GB. The Arc A380 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 186 GB/s (Arc A380) — a 190.6% advantage for the Arc A380. Bus width: 32-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 4 MB (Arc A380) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 186 GB/s+191% |
| Bus Width | 32-bit | 96-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A380). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: Navi 24 Media vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A380).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | Navi 24 Media | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6300M draws 35W versus the Arc A380's 75W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6300M) vs 300W (Arc A380). Power connectors: Mobile vs None. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 59.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300M | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-53% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 190mm |
| Height | — | 114mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 59-16% |
| Perf/Watt | 183.5+118% | 84.0 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6300M and Arc A380
