
Radeon RX 5300
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌88.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 53W.
Radeon RX 6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 53W instead of 100W, a 47W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 180mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌23.3% HIGHER MSRP$159 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 48.6 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5300
2020Radeon RX 6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 53W instead of 100W, a 47W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 180mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌88.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 53W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌23.3% HIGHER MSRP$159 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 48.6 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6400 better than Radeon RX 5300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5300 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5300 and Radeon RX 6400

Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.

Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400
The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5300 scores 7,606 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2321 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,606 | 7,728+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+83% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS+30% | 3.565 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 2321 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+83% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 6400 is on a newer tier with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF, while the Radeon RX 5300 tops out at FSR Frame Generation.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5300 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6400 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 6400 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (Radeon RX 5300) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 6400) — a 31.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5300. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s+31% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5300 draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 61.4% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5300) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 180mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 53W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 180mm | 172mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.1 | 145.8+92% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159. The Radeon RX 5300 costs 18.9% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 59.0 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 48.6 (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 21.4% better value. The Radeon RX 6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-19% | $159 |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.0+21% | 48.6 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Navi 24 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #336 | #330 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












