RADEON X700 SE vs GeForce Go 6600
RADEON X700 SE
Popular choices:
GeForce Go 6600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X700 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2012). The RADEON X700 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 6600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X700 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 6600.
| Insight | RADEON X700 SE | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON X700 SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X700 SE and GeForce Go 6600
RADEON X700 SE
The RADEON X700 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.
GeForce Go 6600
The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X700 SE scores 71 and the GeForce Go 6600 reaches 69 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X700 SE is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce Go 6600 uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 960 (GeForce Go 6600). Raw compute: 15.77 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 SE) vs 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 71+3% | 69 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+87% | 960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.77 TFLOPS+696% | 1.981 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+113% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 112+40% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+540% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+426% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON X700 SE) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce Go 6600) — the RADEON X700 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+426% | 0.38 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X700 SE draws 75W versus the GeForce Go 6600's 140W — a 60.5% difference. The RADEON X700 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X700 SE) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6600). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-46% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9+80% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X700 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | — |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GK106 |
| Release | January 4 2023 | September 6 2012 |
| Ranking | #139 | #490 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X700 SE and GeForce Go 6600
