RADEON X700 SE vs Quadro FX 3000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON X700 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The RADEON X700 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON X700 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 3000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	RADEON X700 SE	Quadro FX 3000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Longevity	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON X700 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the Quadro FX 3000, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 54.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON X700 SE	Quadro FX 3000
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+54.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($10)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON X700 SE Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 3000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X700 SE and Quadro FX 3000

RADEON X700 SE

The RADEON X700 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.

Quadro FX 3000

The Quadro FX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RADEON X700 SE scores 71 and the Quadro FX 3000 reaches 69 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X700 SE is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro FX 3000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3000). Raw compute: 15.77 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 SE) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3000).

Feature	RADEON X700 SE	Quadro FX 3000
G3D Mark Score	71+3%	69
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	1792+647%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.77 TFLOPS+2435%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	112+40%	80
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X700 SE	Quadro FX 3000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON X700 SE comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3000 has 256 MB. The Quadro FX 3000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON X700 SE) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3000) — the RADEON X700 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X700 SE	Quadro FX 3000
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X700 SE draws 75W versus the Quadro FX 3000's 189W — a 86.4% difference. The RADEON X700 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X700 SE) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON X700 SE	Quadro FX 3000
TDP	75W-60%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	0.9+125%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON X700 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Quadro FX 3000 launched at $0 and now averages $15. The RADEON X700 SE costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.1 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 4.6 (Quadro FX 3000) — the RADEON X700 SE offers 54.3% better value. The RADEON X700 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).