RADEON X700 SE vs Radeon HD 2350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2350

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

4710%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

4525%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

4473%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

4465%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

4456%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

4431%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

4375%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

4358%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

4318%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

4306%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

4255%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

4245%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

4169%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

4166%

#307

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

5195%

#322

Radeon HD 2350

MSRP: $50|Avg: $48

100%

#323

Radeon HD 2400

MSRP: $79|Avg: $10

99%

#324

Radeon HD 2400 XT

MSRP: $79|Avg: $10

98%

#326

GeForce 7300 GT

MSRP: $89|Avg: $20

90%

#327

Radeon HD 3870 X2

MSRP: $449|Avg: $40

85%

#329

GeForce 7950 GT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $50

75%

#330

RADEON X550XT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $40

73%

#334

Radeon X1650 Pro

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

55%

#336

RADEON X550

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

55%

#337

Radeon HD 8350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $39

53%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON X700 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2012). The RADEON X700 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 2350 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 2350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X700 SE.

Insight	RADEON X700 SE	Radeon HD 2350
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+8.5%)
Longevity	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON X700 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $48 for the Radeon HD 2350, it costs 79% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 342.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON X700 SE	Radeon HD 2350
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+342.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($10)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($48)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON X700 SE Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 2350 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X700 SE and Radeon HD 2350

RADEON X700 SE

The RADEON X700 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.

Radeon HD 2350

The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON X700 SE scores 71 versus the Radeon HD 2350's 77 — the Radeon HD 2350 leads by 8.5%. The RADEON X700 SE is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon HD 2350 uses GCN 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350). Raw compute: 15.77 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 SE) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2350). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	RADEON X700 SE	Radeon HD 2350
G3D Mark Score	71	77+8%
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1792	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.77 TFLOPS+450%	2.867 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2200 MHz+76%	1250 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	112	112
L1 Cache	512 KB+14%	448 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X700 SE	Radeon HD 2350
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON X700 SE comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2350 has 256 MB. The Radeon HD 2350 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON X700 SE) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 2350) — the RADEON X700 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X700 SE	Radeon HD 2350
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X700 SE draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 2350's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The RADEON X700 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X700 SE) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2350). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	RADEON X700 SE	Radeon HD 2350
TDP	75W-63%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	0.9+125%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON X700 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon HD 2350 launched at $50 and now averages $48. The RADEON X700 SE costs 79.2% less ($38 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.1 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 1.6 (Radeon HD 2350) — the RADEON X700 SE offers 343.8% better value. The RADEON X700 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).