
RADEON X700 SE vs RADEON X700

RADEON X700 SE
Popular choices:

RADEON X700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X700 SE.
| Insight | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $10 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2.8% better value per dollar than the RADEON X700 SE.
| Insight | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X700 SE and RADEON X700

RADEON X700 SE
The RADEON X700 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.

RADEON X700
The RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X700 SE scores 71 and the RADEON X700 reaches 73 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X700 SE is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RADEON X700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 2,304 (RADEON X700). Raw compute: 15.77 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 SE) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (RADEON X700). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 2450 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (RADEON X700 SE) vs 36 (RADEON X700).
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 71 | 73+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2304+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.77 TFLOPS+40% | 11.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz | 2450 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 36+29% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X700 SE comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 has 256 MB. The RADEON X700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON X700 SE) vs 3 MB (RADEON X700) — the RADEON X700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X700 SE draws 75W versus the RADEON X700's 175W — a 80% difference. The RADEON X700 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X700 SE) vs 350W (RADEON X700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-57% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9+125% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X700 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the RADEON X700 launched at $149 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.1 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 7.3 (RADEON X700) — the RADEON X700 offers 2.8% better value. The RADEON X700 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.1 | 7.3+3% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Navi 22 |
| Release | January 4 2023 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #139 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















