
RADEON X700 SE vs Quadro FX 540

RADEON X700 SE
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 540
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 540
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X700 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The RADEON X700 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 540 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 540 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X700 SE.
| Insight | RADEON X700 SE | Quadro FX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-14.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+14.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X700 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the Quadro FX 540, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 31.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X700 SE | Quadro FX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+31.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X700 SE and Quadro FX 540

RADEON X700 SE
The RADEON X700 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.

Quadro FX 540
The Quadro FX 540 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X700 SE scores 71 versus the Quadro FX 540's 81 — the Quadro FX 540 leads by 14.1%. The RADEON X700 SE is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro FX 540 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 240 (Quadro FX 540). Raw compute: 15.77 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 SE) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 540).
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | Quadro FX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 71 | 81+14% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+647% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.77 TFLOPS+2435% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+40% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | Quadro FX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON X700 SE) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 540) — the RADEON X700 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | Quadro FX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X700 SE draws 75W versus the Quadro FX 540's 189W — a 86.4% difference. The RADEON X700 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X700 SE) vs 350W (Quadro FX 540). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | Quadro FX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-60% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9+125% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X700 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Quadro FX 540 launched at $299 and now averages $15. The RADEON X700 SE costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.1 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 5.4 (Quadro FX 540) — the RADEON X700 SE offers 31.5% better value. The RADEON X700 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | Quadro FX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.1+31% | 5.4 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GT200B |
| Release | January 4 2023 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #139 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















