
RADEON X700 SE vs Radeon 3100

RADEON X700 SE
Popular choices:

Radeon 3100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 3100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X700 SE.
| Insight | RADEON X700 SE | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X700 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $30 for the Radeon 3100, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 187.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X700 SE | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+187.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X700 SE and Radeon 3100

RADEON X700 SE
The RADEON X700 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.

Radeon 3100
The Radeon 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X700 SE scores 71 and the Radeon 3100 reaches 74 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X700 SE is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 512 (Radeon 3100). Raw compute: 15.77 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 SE) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3100). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 71 | 74+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+250% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.77 TFLOPS+1165% | 1.247 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+81% | 1218 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+250% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X700 SE comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 3100 has 512 MB. The Radeon 3100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON X700 SE) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 3100) — the RADEON X700 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X700 SE draws 75W versus the Radeon 3100's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X700 SE) vs 350W (Radeon 3100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9 | 1.5+67% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X700 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon 3100 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The RADEON X700 SE costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.1 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 2.5 (Radeon 3100) — the RADEON X700 SE offers 184% better value. The RADEON X700 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-67% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.1+184% | 2.5 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | January 4 2023 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #139 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















