RADEON X700 SE vs RADEON X600 PRO
RADEON X700 SE
Popular choices:
RADEON X600 PRO
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X600 PRO
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X700 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON X600 PRO offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X700 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $10 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 6% better value per dollar than the RADEON X600 PRO.
| Insight | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X700 SE and RADEON X600 PRO
RADEON X700 SE
The RADEON X700 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.
RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X700 SE scores 71 versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 67 — the RADEON X700 SE leads by 6%. The RADEON X700 SE is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RADEON X600 PRO uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO). Raw compute: 15.77 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 SE) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 71+6% | 67 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.77 TFLOPS+147% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+41% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X700 SE comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X600 PRO has 512 MB. The RADEON X600 PRO offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON X700 SE) vs 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X700 SE draws 75W versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The RADEON X700 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X700 SE) vs 350W (RADEON X600 PRO). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 65mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9+125% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X700 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the RADEON X600 PRO launched at $99 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.1 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 6.7 (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X700 SE offers 6% better value. The RADEON X700 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.1+6% | 6.7 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 4 2023 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #139 | #216 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X700 SE and RADEON X600 PRO
