
RADEON X700 SE vs MOBILITY RADEON X700

RADEON X700 SE
Popular choices:

MOBILITY RADEON X700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X700 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The RADEON X700 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X700 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON X700.
| Insight | RADEON X700 SE | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X700 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $20 for the MOBILITY RADEON X700, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 111.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X700 SE | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+111.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X700 SE and MOBILITY RADEON X700

RADEON X700 SE
The RADEON X700 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.

MOBILITY RADEON X700
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X700 SE scores 71 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700's 67 — the RADEON X700 SE leads by 6%. The RADEON X700 SE is built on RDNA 3.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 uses TeraScale 2, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700). Raw compute: 15.77 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 SE) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X700).
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 71+6% | 67 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+124% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.77 TFLOPS+1308% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+180% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+540% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON X700 SE) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON X700) — the RADEON X700 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X700 SE draws 75W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700's 50W — a 40% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X700 SE) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9 | 1.3+44% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X700 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 launched at $100 and now averages $20. The RADEON X700 SE costs 50% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.1 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 3.4 (MOBILITY RADEON X700) — the RADEON X700 SE offers 108.8% better value. The RADEON X700 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | RADEON X700 SE | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-50% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.1+109% | 3.4 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Broadway |
| Release | January 4 2023 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #139 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















