RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX A5000
RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX A5000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX A5000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX A5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,722 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 95% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 230W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A5000
2021Why buy it
- ✅52.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 192).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌86.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,721 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 230W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX A5000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
RTX A5000
The RTX A5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,951 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 24,046 and the RTX A5000 reaches 22,951 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A5000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 8,192 (RTX A5000). Raw compute: 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A5000). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 64 (RTX A5000) with 192 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,046+5% | 22,951 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 8192+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 26.73 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1695 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 192 | 256+33% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 8 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 64+33% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 256+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A5000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A5000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5000 carries 24 GB. RTX A5000 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5000) — a 113.3% advantage for the RTX A5000. Memory bus width is 160-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 384-bit on the RTX A5000. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 6 MB (RTX A5000) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 24 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 768 GB/s+113% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 384-bit+140% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 12.1 (RTX A5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5000).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation draws 70W versus the RTX A5000's 230W — a 106.7% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 650W (RTX A5000). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-70% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 343.5+244% | 99.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation came in at $1999, while the RTX A5000 launched at $3721. On MSRP, RTX 4000 Ada Generation was 46.3% cheaper ($1722 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 6.2 (RTX A5000) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation offers 93.5% better value. The newer card here is RTX 4000 Ada Generation (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999-46% | $3721 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.0+94% | 6.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #47 | #53 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4000 Ada Generation and RTX A5000
