RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Radeon AI PRO R9700
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Radeon AI PRO R9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar Radeon AI PRO R9700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon AI PRO R9700.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 4.0 (2025) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,450 versus $4,095 for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation, it costs 65% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 166.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+166.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,095) | ✅More affordable ($1,450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation and Radeon AI PRO R9700
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 30,269 versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 28,589 — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads by 5.9%. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 64 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) with 400 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,269+6% | 28,589 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+213% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+36% | 47.84 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz | 2920 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 176+38% | 128 |
| TMUs | 400+56% | 256 |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+800% | 8 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100+56% | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | 400+213% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 32 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+800% | 8 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation draws 250W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: 16-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 121.1+27% | 95.3 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000 MSRP and currently averages $4095, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299 and now averages $1450. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 costs 64.6% less ($2645 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.4 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 19.7 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 166.2% better value. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $1299-68% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4095 | $1450-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.4 | 19.7+166% |
| Codename | AD102 | Navi 48 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #16 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 5000 Ada Generation and Radeon AI PRO R9700
