Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Core Ultra 9 285K
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Core Ultra 9 285K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Core Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($225) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($550) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Chagall PRO (2022) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Core Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+141%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($225) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($550) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Core Ultra 9 285K
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Core Ultra 9 285K
The Core Ultra 9 285K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 67,482 points. Launch price was $589.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, matching the Core Ultra 9 285K's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus 5.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285K — a 21.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 285K uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX scores 66,614 against the Core Ultra 9 285K's 67,482 — a 1.3% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 45,000 vs 45,563 (1.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,550 vs 3,200, a 69.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,500 vs 22,563 (37.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285K). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285K.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Core Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 24 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.6 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+3% | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+256% | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+500% |
| Process | 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Chagall PRO (2022) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 66,614 | 67,482+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 45,000 | 45,563+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,550 | 3,200+106% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,500 | 22,563+46% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285K uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285K — the Core Ultra 9 285K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs 2 (Core Ultra 9 285K). PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs 24 (Core Ultra 9 285K) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) and Z890 (Core Ultra 9 285K).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Core Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+967% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs true (Core Ultra 9 285K). The Core Ultra 9 285K includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 64EU), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430; Core Ultra 9 285K rivals Ryzen 9 9950X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Core Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel Arc Graphics 64EU |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Professional Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX launched at $2399 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 9 285K debuted at $589. At current prices ($225 vs $550), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $325 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX delivers 296.1 pts/$ vs 122.7 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 9 285K — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 82.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | Core Ultra 9 285K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399 | $589-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $225-59% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 296.1+141% | 122.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Core Ultra 9 285K
