Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon w9-3475X

CPU

GPU

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

24 Cores48 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Threadripper Pro family

···

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w9-3475X

36 Cores72 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon w9-3475X Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

24 / 48

66,614

+2.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w9-3475X

36 / 72

65,077

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon w9-3475X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon w9-3475X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,340 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 17.4 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 300W, a 20W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 44,869).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3475X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w9-3475X

2023

Why buy it

✅+189.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.4 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($3,739 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than Xeon w9-3475X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is ahead with a 19.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3475X pulls ahead with 189.5% better Geekbench multi-core. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX also has the bigger cache pool with 55.2% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 83 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3475X is the stronger fit. You are getting 189.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 36 cores and 72 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX comes in $1,340 cheaper on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $3,739 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon w9-3475X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 189.5% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 59.5% better value on MSRP (27.8 vs 17.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3475X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, more multi-core headroom with 36 cores / 72 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs Xeon w9-3475X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Xeon w9-3475X

The Xeon w9-3475X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,077 points. Launch price was $3,739.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w9-3475X offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon w9-3475X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3475X — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3475X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX scores 66,614 against the Xeon w9-3475X's 65,077 — a 2.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,550 vs 1,814, a 15.7% lead for the Xeon w9-3475X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,500 vs 44,869 (97.3% advantage for the Xeon w9-3475X). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3475X.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w9-3475X
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	36 / 72+50%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	4.8 GHz+7%
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+73%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB+55%	82.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Chagall PRO (2022)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	66,614+2%	65,077
Cinebench R23 Multi	45,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,550	1,814+17%
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,500	44,869+189%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3475X — the Xeon w9-3475X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w9-3475X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3475X) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) and W790 (Xeon w9-3475X).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w9-3475X
Socket	sWRX8	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	4096 GB+100%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w9-3475X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) vs true (Xeon w9-3475X). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430; Xeon w9-3475X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w9-3475X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	true
Target Use	Professional Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX was priced at $2399, while the Xeon w9-3475X came in at $3739. On launch pricing ($2399 vs $3739), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX was $1340 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX delivers 27.8 pts/$ vs 17.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3475X — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 45.9% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX	Xeon w9-3475X
MSRP	$2399-36%	$3739
Performance per Dollar	27.8+60%	17.4
Release Date	2022	2023

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3475X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.