
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Xeon 6737P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Xeon 6737P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Xeon 6737P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Xeon 6737P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +38.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $2,500 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
- β Delivers 88.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
- β 45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (29,745 vs 45,000).
- βOlder platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6737P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
- βNo AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon 6737P
2025Why buy it
- β +51.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- β Draws 270W instead of 280W, a 10W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6737P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Xeon 6737P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.

Xeon 6737P
The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024β2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon 6737P share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P β a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024β2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX scores 74,985 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 β a 6% lead for the Xeon 6737P. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,686 vs 2,000, a 17% lead for the Xeon 6737P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,745 vs 45,000 (40.8% advantage for the Xeon 6737P). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+13% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+24% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB | 144 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Chagall PRO (2022) | Granite Rapids (2024β2025) |
| PassMark | 74,985 | 79,634+6% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 53,977 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,686 | 2,000+19% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,745 | 45,000+51% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P β the Xeon 6737P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6737P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) vs 88 (Xeon 6737P) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6737P supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P). Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | β | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX was priced at $2495, while the Xeon 6737P came in at $4995. On launch pricing ($2495 vs $4995), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX was $2500 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P β making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX the 61.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2495-50% | $4995 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.1+89% | 15.9 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














