
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Xeon Platinum 8461V
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Xeon Platinum 8461V FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Xeon Platinum 8461V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+31.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 98 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,996 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 80.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 16.7 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 300W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8461V moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Platinum 8461V
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (74,982 vs 74,985).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (98 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.7 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX better than Xeon Platinum 8461V?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Xeon Platinum 8461V Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.

Xeon Platinum 8461V
The Xeon Platinum 8461V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 74,982 points. Launch price was $4,491.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8461V has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8461V — a 19.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX scores 74,985 against the Xeon Platinum 8461V's 74,982 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8461V.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Platinum 8461V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 48 / 96+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+22% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+64% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+31% | 97.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Chagall PRO (2022) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 74,985 | 74,982 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 53,977 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,686 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,745 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8461V uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX versus 4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8461V — the Xeon Platinum 8461V supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8461V supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8461V) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8461V).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Platinum 8461V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8461V supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8461V). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Xeon Platinum 8461V rivals EPYC 9454.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Platinum 8461V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX was priced at $2495, while the Xeon Platinum 8461V came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($2495 vs $4491), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX was $1996 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 16.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8461V — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX the 57.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Platinum 8461V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2495-44% | $4491 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.1+80% | 16.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














