
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,002 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 145.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,745 vs 55,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 300 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+84.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX better than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
The Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 79,683 points. Launch price was $6,497.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX scores 74,985 against the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+'s 79,683 — a 6.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,686 vs 1,961, a 15.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,745 vs 55,000 (59.6% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 48 / 96+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+13% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+57% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB | 300 MB (total)+134% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Chagall PRO (2022) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 74,985 | 79,683+6% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 53,977 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,686 | 1,961+16% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,745 | 55,000+85% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX was priced at $2495, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ came in at $6497. On launch pricing ($2495 vs $6497), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX was $4002 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX the 84.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2495-62% | $6497 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.1+145% | 12.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














