Quadro P2200 vs Radeon HD 2400

NVIDIA

Quadro P2200

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1493 MHz
Similar parts
·····
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 2400

2009Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P2200 vs Radeon HD 2400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P2200 vs Radeon HD 2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P2200 vs Radeon HD 2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P2200

2019

Why buy it

  • 2159.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 1328.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • 900% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Radeon HD 2400 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P2200 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 190W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon HD 2400

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $350 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P2200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
  • 153.3% higher power demand at 190W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P2200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2159.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 7657% in PassMark G3D (9,386 vs 121), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P2200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 5 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $350 more expensive on MSRP at $429 vs $79, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1328.4% (21.9 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro P2200 vs Radeon HD 2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 2400

The Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 versus the Radeon HD 2400's 121 — the Quadro P2200 leads by 7657%. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 2400 uses TeraScale, both on 16 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 800 (Radeon HD 2400). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400).

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon HD 2400
G3D Mark Score
9,386+7657%
121
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale
Process Node
16 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1280+60%
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.822 TFLOPS+181%
1.36 TFLOPS
ROPs
40+150%
16
TMUs
80+100%
40
L1 Cache
480 KB+200%
160 KB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB+400%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon HD 2400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2200 has 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2400 carries 512 MB. Quadro P2200 gives you 900% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P2200 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 2400. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 2400) — the Quadro P2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon HD 2400
VRAM Capacity
5 GB+900%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1.25 MB+400%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 2400's 190W — a 86.8% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon HD 2400
TDP
75W-61%
190W
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
201mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
125.1+20750%
0.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P2200 came in at $429, while the Radeon HD 2400 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon HD 2400 was 81.6% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.9 (Quadro P2200) vs 1.5 (Radeon HD 2400) — the Quadro P2200 offers 1360% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P2200 (2019 vs 2009).

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon HD 2400
MSRP
$429
$79-82%
Performance per Dollar
21.9+1360%
1.5
Codename
GP106
RV790
Release
June 10 2019
April 2 2009
Ranking
#281
#762

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.