Quadro P2200 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P2200 is positioned at rank 72 and the Radeon HD 2600 XT is on rank 677, so the Quadro P2200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2200

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

98%

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

86%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

82%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

82%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

80%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

80%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

77%

#57

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

675%

#72

Quadro P2200

MSRP: $429|Avg: $227

100%

#73

T1000

MSRP: $350|Avg: $382

100%

#74

Quadro P620

MSRP: $170|Avg: $48

99%

#78

Radeon Pro 570

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

97%

#80

T400

MSRP: $180|Avg: $179

92%

#86

Quadro P3200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $63

78%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2600 XT

#666

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

7646%

#668

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

6931%

#669

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

6913%

#673

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

6286%

#674

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

6243%

#676

GeForce 7500 LE

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

100%

#677

Radeon HD 2600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $40

100%

#678

GeForce 9650M GT

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

96%

#679

GeForce 8400 SE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

96%

#680

GeForce 9650M GS

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

96%

#681

GeForce 8400M GT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $30

94%

#682

Mobility Radeon HD 3410

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

91%

#683

GeForce 9200M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

91%

#684

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

86%

#685

GeForce 9300M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

83%

#686

Mobility Radeon HD 2400

MSRP: $79|Avg: $1

80%

#687

GeForce 6150 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

77%

#688

Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2

MSRP: $449|Avg: $50

75%

#689

GeForce 9450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

74%

#690

GeForce 9800 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $75

72%

#691

GeForce 7900 GS

MSRP: $259|Avg: $50

71%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro P2200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Quadro P2200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 2600 XT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P2200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3216.6% higher G3D Mark score and 900% more VRAM (5 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 2600 XT.

Insight	Quadro P2200	Radeon HD 2600 XT
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3216.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3216.6%)
Longevity	Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (5 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro P2200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $227 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 484.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon HD 2600 XT.

Insight	Quadro P2200	Radeon HD 2600 XT
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+484.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($227)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P2200 Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 2600 XT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2200 and Radeon HD 2600 XT

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

Radeon HD 2600 XT

The Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 283 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 versus the Radeon HD 2600 XT's 283 — the Quadro P2200 leads by 3216.6%. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 2600 XT uses TeraScale 2, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2600 XT). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2600 XT).

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon HD 2600 XT
G3D Mark Score	9,386+3217%	283
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 2
Process Node	16 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1280+167%	480
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.822 TFLOPS+449%	0.696 TFLOPS
ROPs	40+400%	8
TMUs	80+233%	24
L1 Cache	480 KB+900%	48 KB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB+400%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon HD 2600 XT
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2200 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2600 XT has 512 MB. The Quadro P2200 offers 900% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 2600 XT) — the Quadro P2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon HD 2600 XT
VRAM Capacity	5 GB+900%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.25 MB+400%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 2600 XT's 25W — a 100% difference. The Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2600 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon HD 2600 XT
TDP	75W	25W-67%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	201mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	125.1+1007%	11.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P2200 launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $227, while the Radeon HD 2600 XT launched at $199 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 2600 XT costs 82.4% less ($187 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.3 (Quadro P2200) vs 7.1 (Radeon HD 2600 XT) — the Quadro P2200 offers 481.7% better value. The Quadro P2200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).