
Tesla K80 vs GeForce GTX 1060

Tesla K80
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla K80 is positioned at rank #343 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 87.7% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K80.
| Insight | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-87.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+87.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $60), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 56.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+56.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K80 and GeForce GTX 1060

Tesla K80
The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla K80 scores 5,363 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 87.7%. The Tesla K80 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,496 (Tesla K80) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 824 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,363 | 10,064+88% |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2496 ×2 | 2560+3% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 | 8.873 TFLOPS+116% |
| Boost Clock | 824 MHz | 1733 MHz+110% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 208 ×2+30% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 208 KB | 960 KB+362% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla K80 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K80 draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K80) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 180W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | — | 173mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 17.9 | 55.9+212% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla K80 launched at $5000 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The Tesla K80 costs 16.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 107.3 (Tesla K80) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 56.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5000 | $249-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-17% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 107.3 | 167.7+56% |
| Codename | GK210 | GP104 |
| Release | November 17 2014 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #419 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















