Tesla K80 vs GeForce RTX 4070
Tesla K80
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla K80 is positioned at rank #343 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K80 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 401.9% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K80.
| Insight | Tesla K80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-401.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+401.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla K80 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 91% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 119.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla K80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+119.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K80 and GeForce RTX 4070
Tesla K80
The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla K80 scores 5,363 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 401.9%. The Tesla K80 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,496 (Tesla K80) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 824 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,363 | 26,919+402% |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2496 ×2 | 5888+136% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 | 29.15 TFLOPS+609% |
| Boost Clock | 824 MHz | 2475 MHz+200% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 208 ×2+13% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 0.2 MB | 5.8 MB+2800% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 36 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla K80 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla K80 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 36 MB+2300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K80 draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K80) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 200W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | — | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 17.9 | 134.6+652% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla K80 launched at $5000 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The Tesla K80 costs 90.9% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 107.3 (Tesla K80) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the Tesla K80 offers 119.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5000 | $599-88% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-91% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 107.3+119% | 48.9 |
| Codename | GK210 | AD104 |
| Release | November 17 2014 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #419 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla K80 and GeForce RTX 4070
