
Tesla K80 vs Radeon RX 6300

Tesla K80
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla K80 is positioned at rank 343 and the Radeon RX 6300 is on rank 14, so the Radeon RX 6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6300 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The Radeon RX 6300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K80 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla K80 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300.
| Insight | Tesla K80 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the Tesla K80, it costs 20% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 24% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla K80 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K80 and Radeon RX 6300

Tesla K80
The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.

Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla K80 scores 5,363 and the Radeon RX 6300 reaches 5,319 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla K80 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,496 (Tesla K80) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 824 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,363 | 5,319 |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2496 ×2+225% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2+12% | 3.686 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 824 MHz | 2400 MHz+191% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 208 ×2+333% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 208 KB | 256 KB+23% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla K80 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the Tesla K80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+300% | 32-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K80 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 158.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K80) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 35W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 160mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 17.9 | 152.0+749% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla K80 launched at $5000 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX 6300 costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 107.3 (Tesla K80) vs 133.0 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 24% better value. The Radeon RX 6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Tesla K80 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5000 | $60-99% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 107.3 | 133.0+24% |
| Codename | GK210 | Navi 24 |
| Release | November 17 2014 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #419 | #379 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















