Tesla K80 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla K80 is positioned at rank #343 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80

#117

L40

MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174

98%

#328

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

13807%

#343

Tesla K80

MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50

100%

#344

GRID M10-4Q

MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340

99%

#346

GRID M10-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

97%

#347

FirePro V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170

96%

#348

Quadro FX 3800

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

96%

#350

GRID K520

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50

92%

#351

GRID P40-12Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

91%

#352

FirePro 2270

MSRP: $149|Avg: $30

89%

#353

FirePro 2460

MSRP: $180|Avg: $10

88%

#355

FirePro 3D V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

85%

#356

Quadro FX 580

MSRP: $199|Avg: $500

85%

#358

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K80.

Insight	Tesla K80	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Tesla K80 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K80 and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Tesla K80

The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Tesla K80 scores 5,363 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM reaches 5,474 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla K80 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,496 (Tesla K80) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Raw compute: 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Boost clocks: 824 MHz vs 980 MHz.

Feature	Tesla K80	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
G3D Mark Score	5,363	5,474+2%
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2496 ×2+86%	1344
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.113 TFLOPS ×2+56%	2.634 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	824 MHz	980 MHz+19%
ROPs	48 ×2+50%	32
TMUs	208 ×2+86%	112
L1 Cache	208 KB+86%	112 KB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+200%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Tesla K80	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) — the Tesla K80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Tesla K80	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+200%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla K80 draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM's 170W — a 55.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K80) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.