
Tesla K80 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Tesla K80
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla K80 is positioned at rank #343 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K80 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 46.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K80.
| Insight | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-46.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+46.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla K80 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $75 for the GeForce GTX 1650, it costs 33% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 2.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K80 and GeForce GTX 1650

Tesla K80
The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla K80 scores 5,363 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 46.7%. The Tesla K80 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,496 (Tesla K80) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 824 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,363 | 7,869+47% |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2496 ×2+179% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2+38% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 824 MHz | 1665 MHz+102% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 208 ×2+271% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 208 KB | 896 KB+331% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Tesla K80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K80 draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K80) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 75W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 17.9 | 104.9+486% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla K80 launched at $5000 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Tesla K80 costs 33.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 107.3 (Tesla K80) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Tesla K80 offers 2.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Tesla K80 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5000 | $149-97% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-33% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | 107.3+2% | 104.9 |
| Codename | GK210 | TU117 |
| Release | November 17 2014 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #419 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















