Tesla K80 vs GeForce GTX 950

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla K80 is positioned at rank #343 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80

#117

L40

MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174

98%

#328

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

13807%

#343

Tesla K80

MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50

100%

#344

GRID M10-4Q

MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340

99%

#346

GRID M10-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

97%

#347

FirePro V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170

96%

#348

Quadro FX 3800

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

96%

#350

GRID K520

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50

92%

#351

GRID P40-12Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

91%

#352

FirePro 2270

MSRP: $149|Avg: $30

89%

#353

FirePro 2460

MSRP: $180|Avg: $10

88%

#355

FirePro 3D V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

85%

#356

Quadro FX 580

MSRP: $199|Avg: $500

85%

#358

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla K80 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950.

Insight	Tesla K80	GeForce GTX 950
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 950 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 950 holds the technical lead. Priced at $48 (vs $50), it costs 4% less, resulting in a 4.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Tesla K80	GeForce GTX 950
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+4.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)	✅More affordable ($48)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Tesla K80 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 950 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K80 and GeForce GTX 950

Tesla K80

The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.

GeForce GTX 950

The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Tesla K80 scores 5,363 and the GeForce GTX 950 reaches 5,357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla K80 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 950 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,496 (Tesla K80) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 950). Raw compute: 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80) vs 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950). Boost clocks: 824 MHz vs 1188 MHz.

Feature	Tesla K80	GeForce GTX 950
G3D Mark Score	5,363	5,357
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2496 ×2+225%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.113 TFLOPS ×2+125%	1.825 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	824 MHz	1188 MHz+44%
ROPs	48 ×2+50%	32
TMUs	208 ×2+333%	48
L1 Cache	208 KB	288 KB+38%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Tesla K80	GeForce GTX 950
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla K80 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950 has 2 GB. The Tesla K80 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) — the Tesla K80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Tesla K80	GeForce GTX 950
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla K80 draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 950's 90W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K80) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Tesla K80	GeForce GTX 950
TDP	300W	90W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	202mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	17.9	59.5+232%

💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla K80 launched at $5000 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 and now averages $48. The GeForce GTX 950 costs 4% less ($2 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 107.3 (Tesla K80) vs 111.6 (GeForce GTX 950) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 4% better value. The GeForce GTX 950 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).