Tesla K80 vs Radeon 760M
Tesla K80
Popular choices:
Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla K80 is positioned at rank 343 and the Radeon 760M is on rank 294, so the Radeon 760M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 760M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2014). The Radeon 760M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K80 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 760M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K80.
| Insight | Tesla K80 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 760M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K80 and Radeon 760M
Tesla K80
The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla K80 scores 5,363 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla K80 is built on Kepler 2.0 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,496 (Tesla K80) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 824 MHz vs 2599 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,363 | 5,449+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2496 ×2+388% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 | 5.323 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 824 MHz | 2599 MHz+215% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 208 ×2+550% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 208 KB+63% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla K80 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K80 draws 300W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 181% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K80) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Tesla K80 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 15W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 17.9 | 363.3+1930% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | Tesla K80 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5000 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | — |
| Codename | GK210 | Phoenix |
| Release | November 17 2014 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #419 | #421 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla K80 and Radeon 760M
