
Xeon E7-4890 v2
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6246R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E7-4890 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 205W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6246R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,500 vs 16,000).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6246R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 32) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌32.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 155W.
Xeon E7-4890 v2
2014Xeon Gold 6246R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 205W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 32) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6246R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,500 vs 16,000).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌32.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 155W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6246R better than Xeon E7-4890 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E7-4890 v2 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E7-4890 v2 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E7-4890 v2 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 774 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 774 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 763 FPS | 762 FPS |
| ultra | 679 FPS | 762 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 744 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 638 FPS | 720 FPS |
| high | 605 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 537 FPS | 596 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 376 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E7-4890 v2 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 774 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 774 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 765 FPS | 762 FPS |
| ultra | 648 FPS | 739 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 774 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 686 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 586 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 568 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 592 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E7-4890 v2 and Xeon Gold 6246R

Xeon E7-4890 v2
Xeon E7-4890 v2
The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6246R
Xeon Gold 6246R
The Xeon Gold 6246R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,468 points. Launch price was $3,286.
Processing Power
The Xeon E7-4890 v2 packs 15 cores / 30 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6246R offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6246R has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6246R — a 18.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6246R is built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7-4890 v2 scores 30,946 against the Xeon Gold 6246R's 30,468 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon E7-4890 v2. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 6,500 vs 16,000 (84.4% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 730 vs 1,293, a 55.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6246R that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,500 vs 9,848 (56.7% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R). L3 cache: 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6246R.
| Feature | Xeon E7-4890 v2 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 15 / 30 | 16 / 32+7% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.1 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 37.5 MB+5% | 35.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | — | 16 MB |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | — | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,946+2% | 30,468 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 6,500 | 16,000+146% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 730 | 1,293+77% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,500 | 9,848+79% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6246R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6246R — the Xeon Gold 6246R supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4890 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6246R). PCIe lanes: 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6246R) — the Xeon Gold 6246R offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) and Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6246R).
| Feature | Xeon E7-4890 v2 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4-2933+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1536 GB+50% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 6+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6246R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy), Xeon Gold 6246R targets High-frequency Server / Financial. Direct competitor: Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2; Xeon Gold 6246R rivals EPYC 7302.
| Feature | Xeon E7-4890 v2 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server (Legacy) | High-frequency Server / Financial |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













