
Xeon Platinum 8368 vs EPYC 7J13

Xeon Platinum 8368

EPYC 7J13
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8368
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7J13
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8368 | EPYC 7J13 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($429) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8368 | EPYC 7J13 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+163%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($429) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 7J13

Xeon Platinum 8368
The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

EPYC 7J13
The EPYC 7J13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 84,786 points. Launch price was $6,000.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8368 packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the EPYC 7J13 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7J13 has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7J13 — a 2.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 7J13 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7J13 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368 scores 92,054 against the EPYC 7J13's 84,786 — a 8.2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368. L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7J13.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | EPYC 7J13 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 38 / 76 | 64 / 128+68% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.55 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 57 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+349% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 92,054+9% | 84,786 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 20,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,961 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7J13 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus 3200 on the EPYC 7J13 — the EPYC 7J13 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7J13 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs 128 (EPYC 7J13) — the EPYC 7J13 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368) and SP3 (EPYC 7J13).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | EPYC 7J13 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 3200+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+157286300% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8368 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7J13). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543; EPYC 7J13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | EPYC 7J13 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, SEV |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8368 launched at $7214 MSRP, while the EPYC 7J13 debuted at $7890. At current prices ($429 vs $150), the EPYC 7J13 is $279 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368 delivers 214.6 pts/$ vs 565.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 7J13 — making the EPYC 7J13 the 89.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | EPYC 7J13 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7214-9% | $7890 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $429 | $150-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 214.6 | 565.2+163% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















