Xeon Platinum 8368 vs EPYC 9534
Xeon Platinum 8368
EPYC 9534
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8368
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9534
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8368 | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($429) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,999) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8368 | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+622%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($429) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,999) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 9534
Xeon Platinum 8368
The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.
EPYC 9534
The EPYC 9534 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 89,077 points. Launch price was $8,803.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8368 packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the EPYC 9534 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9534 has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9534 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9534 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.45 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 9534 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368 scores 92,054 against the EPYC 9534's 89,077 — a 3.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,961 vs 1,650, a 17.2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,000 vs 15,500 (46.9% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368). L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9534.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 38 / 76 | 64 / 128+68% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.45 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 57 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+349% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 92,054+3% | 89,077 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 20,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,961+19% | 1,650 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000+61% | 15,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9534 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9534 — the EPYC 9534 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9534 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs 12 (EPYC 9534). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs 128 (EPYC 9534) — the EPYC 9534 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368) and SP5 (EPYC 9534).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6144 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9534). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server, EPYC 9534 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543; EPYC 9534 rivals Xeon Platinum 8470.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Server | Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8368 launched at $7214 MSRP, while the EPYC 9534 debuted at $8803. At current prices ($429 vs $2999), the Xeon Platinum 8368 is $2570 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368 delivers 214.6 pts/$ vs 29.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9534 — making the Xeon Platinum 8368 the 151.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | EPYC 9534 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7214-18% | $8803 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $429-86% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 214.6+623% | 29.7 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Platinum 8368 and EPYC 9534
