
A4-1250

Ryzen 7 3700X
A4-1250 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4-1250 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4-1250 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4-1250
2013Why buy it
- β Costs $229 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8210, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,258 vs 22,430).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +708.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Delivers 441.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 12.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β 200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β229% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- β712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while A4-1250 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than A4-1250?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4-1250 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-1250
The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The A4-1250 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1250 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X β a 125.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X. The A4-1250 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1250 scores 1,258 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 β a 178.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-1250 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1 GHz | 4.4 GHz+340% |
| Base Clock | β | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Temash (2013) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 1,258 | 22,430+1683% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 111 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 188 | β |
Memory & Platform
The A4-1250 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L 1333 MHz on the A4-1250 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X β the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1250) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1250) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) β the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT3 (A4-1250) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | A4-1250 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L 1333 MHz | DDR4-3200+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 24+200% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (A4-1250) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The A4-1250 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8210 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | true | β |
| Target Use | Tablet | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A4-1250 was priced at $100, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($100 vs $329), A4-1250 was $229 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A4-1250 delivers 12.6 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 137.7% better value option.
| Feature | A4-1250 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-70% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 68.2+441% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














