Arc A770
GeForce GTX 1650
Arc A770 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A770 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A770 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A770
2022Why buy it
- ✅112.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Alchemist on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌134.2% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
- ❌22.3% longer card at 280mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 280mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A770 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A770
The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A770 scores 13,332 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Arc A770 leads by 69.4%. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,332+69% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+357% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.66 TFLOPS+559% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+44% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+300% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+357% | 56 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+1500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A770 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. Arc A770 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 300% advantage for the Arc A770. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+300% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+1500% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs None. Card length: 280mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 300W-54% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | None |
| Length | 280mm | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3 | 104.9+77% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A770 came in at $349, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 57.3% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 38.2% better value. The newer card here is Arc A770 (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $149-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.2 | 52.8+38% |
| Codename | DG2-512 | TU117 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #191 | #323 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A770 and GeForce GTX 1650
