Arc A770
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A770
2022Why buy it
- ✅67.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌106.5% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌221.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 70W.
- ❌75% longer card at 280mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 66.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 225W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 280mm, a 120mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A770
The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A770 scores 13,332 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the Arc A770 leads by 24%. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1470 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770) vs 18 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) with 512 Tensor cores vs 72.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,332+24% | 10,749 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+78% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.66 TFLOPS+190% | 6.774 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+63% | 1470 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+300% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+256% | 72 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+78% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 512+611% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A770 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. Arc A770 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 204.8% advantage for the Arc A770. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+205% | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs None. Card length: 280mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 70W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 300W-54% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | None |
| Length | 280mm | 160mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3 | 153.6+159% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A770 came in at $349, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 51.6% cheaper ($180 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 66.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $169-52% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.2 | 63.6+66% |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GA107 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #191 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A770 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
