Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 3070

Intel

Arc A770

2022Core: 2100 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
Arc family
···
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3070

2020Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1725 MHz
RTX family
·······

Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 3070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 3070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
  • More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • 15.7% longer card at 280mm vs 242mm.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

  • 23.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 16.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Measures 242mm instead of 280mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 66.3% in PassMark G3D (22,172 vs 13,332), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A770 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 8nm, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2020. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 more expensive on MSRP at $499 vs $349, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 16.3% (44.4 vs 38.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and strong 1440p, GeForce RTX 3070 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Arc A770 has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A770

The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc A770 scores 13,332 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 66.3%. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1725 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 3070) with 512 Tensor cores vs 184.

FeatureArc A770GeForce RTX 3070
G3D Mark Score
13,332
22,172+66%
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Ampere
Process Node
6 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
4096
5888+44%
Compute (TFLOPS)
19.66 TFLOPS
20.31 TFLOPS+3%
Boost Clock
2400 MHz+39%
1725 MHz
ROPs
128+33%
96
TMUs
256+39%
184
L2 Cache
16 MB+300%
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
32
46+44%
Tensor Cores
512+178%
184

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A770 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc A770GeForce RTX 3070
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 carries 8 GB. Arc A770 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 14.3% advantage for the Arc A770. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770 and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A770GeForce RTX 3070
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s+14%
448 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
16 MB+300%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A770GeForce RTX 3070
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).

FeatureArc A770GeForce RTX 3070
Encoder
Dual Xe Media Engine
NVENC 7th gen
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 2.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 280mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureArc A770GeForce RTX 3070
TDP
225W
220W-2%
Recommended PSU
650W
650W
Power Connector
8-pin + 6-pin
8-pin
Length
280mm
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
59.3
100.8+70%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A770 came in at $349, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. On MSRP, Arc A770 was 30.1% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 16.2% better value. The newer card here is Arc A770 (2022 vs 2020).

FeatureArc A770GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP
$349-30%
$499
Performance per Dollar
38.2
44.4+16%
Codename
DG2-512
GA104
Release
October 12 2022
September 1 2020
Ranking
#191
#63

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.