Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6600S

Intel

Arc A770

2022Core: 2100 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
Arc family
···
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6600S

2022Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6600S Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6600S FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6600S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

  • 50.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $51 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • Delivers 17.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 32.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Radeon RX 6600S is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 181.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 80W.
  • 27900% longer card at 280mm vs 1mm.

Radeon RX 6600S

2022

Why buy it

  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 80W instead of 225W, a 145W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 280mm, a 279mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 14.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $400 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.5 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc A770 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 50.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (13,332 vs 13,016), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6600S is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Arc A770 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $349 vs $400, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 17.4% (38.2 vs 32.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Arc A770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6600S has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6600S Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A770

The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

AMD

Radeon RX 6600S

The Radeon RX 6600S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,016 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Radeon RX 6600S reaches 13,016 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 6600S uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600S). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600S). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6600S) with 512 Tensor cores.

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6600S
G3D Mark Score
13,332+2%
13,016
Architecture
Generation 12.7
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
6 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
4096+129%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
19.66 TFLOPS+174%
7.168 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2400 MHz+20%
2000 MHz
ROPs
128+100%
64
TMUs
256+129%
112
L2 Cache
16 MB+700%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
32+14%
28

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6600S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc A770 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6600S
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6600S carries 4 GB. Arc A770 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600S) — a 128.6% advantage for the Arc A770. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 6600S. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600S) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6600S
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s+129%
224 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
16 MB+700%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6600S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6600S
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12_2
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600S). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6600S).

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6600S
Encoder
Dual Xe Media Engine
VCN 3.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
VCN 3.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 6600S's 80W — a 95.1% difference. The Radeon RX 6600S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600S). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 280mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6600S
TDP
225W
80W-64%
Recommended PSU
650W
500W-23%
Power Connector
8-pin + 6-pin
Mobile
Length
280mm
1mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
59.3
162.7+174%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A770 came in at $349, while the Radeon RX 6600S launched at $400. On MSRP, Arc A770 was 12.8% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 32.5 (Radeon RX 6600S) — the Arc A770 offers 17.5% better value.

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP
$349-13%
$400
Performance per Dollar
38.2+18%
32.5
Codename
DG2-512
Navi 23
Release
October 12 2022
January 4 2022
Ranking
#191
#200

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.