Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-13400F

AMD

Athlon X4 760K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
Core family
·······

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 760K

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $96 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,404 vs 11,408).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.8 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • 53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on FM2, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +194.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Delivers 328.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 29.8 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FM2 and older memory support.
  • 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 96% HIGHER MSRP
    $196 MSRPvs$100 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Athlon X4 760K?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 194.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 712.5% better Geekbench multi-core, 739.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 194.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 712.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 96.0% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 194.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 328.2% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 29.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2013), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FM2, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon X4 760K

The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 760K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Athlon X4 760K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 760K scores 2,982 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 157.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 495 vs 2,407, a 131.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,404 vs 11,408 (156.2% advantage for the Core i5-13400F).

FeatureAthlon X4 760KCore i5-13400F
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
10 / 16+150%
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz
4.6 GHz+12%
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+52%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB+220%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
32 nm
Intel 7 nm-78%
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
2,982
25,029+739%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
495
2,407+386%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,404
11,408+713%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 760K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 760K versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 157.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 760K) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A88X (Athlon X4 760K) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

FeatureAthlon X4 760KCore i5-13400F
Socket
FM2
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+157%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
192 GB+500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 760K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Athlon X4 760K targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureAthlon X4 760KCore i5-13400F
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X4 760K was priced at $100, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($100 vs $196), Athlon X4 760K was $96 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 760K delivers 29.8 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 124.3% better value option.

FeatureAthlon X4 760KCore i5-13400F
MSRP
$100-49%
$196
Performance per Dollar
29.8
127.7+329%
Release Date
2013
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.