Atom C3758
VS
Athlon 240GE

Atom C3758 vs Athlon 240GE

Intel

Atom C3758

8 Cores8 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Athlon 240GE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Atom C3758 is positioned at rank #585 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3758

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9008%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1701%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1511%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1167%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
99%
#353
EPYC 7452
MSRP: $2025|Avg: $2025
98%
#354
EPYC 7502P
MSRP: $2300|Avg: $1299
96%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
96%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
95%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
94%
#585
Atom C3758
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#590
Xeon W-2125
MSRP: $444|Avg: $42
98%
#592
EPYC 7261
MSRP: $501|Avg: $8
96%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 240GE

#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
108%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
108%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
108%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
108%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
107%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
107%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
107%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
106%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
106%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
105%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
104%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
104%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
104%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
103%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
100%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
100%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
94%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
94%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
93%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
90%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
88%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
86%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
83%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
83%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
80%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
79%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
78%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
73%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
69%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
68%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
67%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon 240GE leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom C3758 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom C3758Athlon 240GE
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom C3758Athlon 240GE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3758 and Athlon 240GE

Intel

Atom C3758

The Atom C3758 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,614 points. Launch price was $193.

AMD

Athlon 240GE

The Athlon 240GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,561 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

The Atom C3758 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Athlon 240GE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3758 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3758 versus 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 240GE — a 45.6% clock advantage for the Athlon 240GE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Atom C3758 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon 240GE uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3758 scores 4,614 against the Athlon 240GE's 4,561 — a 1.2% lead for the Atom C3758. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 400 vs 930, a 79.7% lead for the Athlon 240GE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,400 vs 2,200 (8.7% advantage for the Atom C3758). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Atom C3758 vs 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 240GE.

FeatureAtom C3758Athlon 240GE
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+300%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+59%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+59%
L3 Cache
16 MB+300%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
16 MB+3100%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
4,614+1%
4,561
Geekbench 6 Single
400
930+133%
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,400+9%
2,200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3758 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 240GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The Atom C3758 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Atom C3758) vs 8 (Athlon 240GE) — the Atom C3758 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Atom C3758) and A320,B450 (Athlon 240GE).

FeatureAtom C3758Athlon 240GE
Socket
FCBGA1310
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+300%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+100%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon 240GE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom C3758) vs AMD-V (Athlon 240GE). The Athlon 240GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Atom C3758 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom C3758 targets Server/Embedded, Athlon 240GE targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 240GE rivals Pentium Gold G5400.

FeatureAtom C3758Athlon 240GE
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Vega 3
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Server/Embedded
Budget Desktop