CPU
GPU
Atom N475
Athlon 64 2800+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N475 is positioned at rank 193 and the Athlon 64 2800+ is on rank 1098, so the Atom N475 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom N475
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2800+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom N475 | Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($75) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (NewCastle (2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom N475 | Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+419%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($75) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom N475 and Athlon 64 2800+
Atom N475
The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.
Athlon 64 2800+
The Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Abril 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $100.
Processing Power
The Atom N475 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Athlon 64 2800+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 versus 1.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 2800+ — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Atom N475. The Atom N475 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon 64 2800+ uses NewCastle (2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N475 scores 405 against the Athlon 64 2800+'s 420 — a 3.6% lead for the Athlon 64 2800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Atom N475 | Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.83 GHz+2% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.83 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm-65% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Pineview (2009−2011) | NewCastle (2004) |
| PassMark | 405 | 420+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Atom N475 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 2800+ uses 754 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-667 on the Atom N475 versus DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 2800+ — the Atom N475 supports -203% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 2800+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N475) and AMD 754 (Athlon 64 2800+).
| Feature | Atom N475 | Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-667 | DDR-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon 64 2800+ requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom N475 | Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3150 | — |
Value Analysis
The Atom N475 launched at $75 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 2800+ debuted at $178.
| Feature | Atom N475 | Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $75-58% | $178 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2004 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom N475 and Athlon 64 2800+
