CPU
GPU
Atom N475
Athlon 64 2600+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N475 is positioned at rank 193 and the Athlon 64 2600+ is on rank 1080, so the Atom N475 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom N475
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2600+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom N475 | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($75) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom N475 | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1352%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($75) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom N475 and Athlon 64 2600+
Atom N475
The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.
Athlon 64 2600+
The Athlon 64 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 392 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Atom N475 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Athlon 64 2600+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 2600+ — a 13.4% clock advantage for the Atom N475. The Atom N475 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon 64 2600+ uses Lima (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N475 scores 405 against the Athlon 64 2600+'s 392 — a 3.3% lead for the Atom N475. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Atom N475 | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.83 GHz+14% | 1.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.83 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Pineview (2009−2011) | Lima (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 405+3% | 392 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom N475 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 2600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-667 on the Atom N475 versus DDR2-667 on the Athlon 64 2600+ — the Atom N475 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 2600+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N475) vs 2 (Athlon 64 2600+). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N475) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 2600+).
| Feature | Atom N475 | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-667+50% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 16 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon 64 2600+ requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom N475 | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3150 | — |
Value Analysis
The Atom N475 launched at $75 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 2600+ debuted at $100.
| Feature | Atom N475 | Athlon 64 2600+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $75-25% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $5 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom N475 and Athlon 64 2600+
