
Celeron 1047UE

Core i5-13400F
Celeron 1047UE vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 1047UE vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Cyberpunk 2077

Deadlock
Celeron 1047UE vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 1047UE
2013Why buy it
- β Costs $96 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (293 vs 11,408).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 20 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- β687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +1186.5% higher average FPS across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).
- β Delivers 1791.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1023 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- β96% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- βNo integrated graphics, while Celeron 1047UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron 1047UE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 1047UE vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1047UE
The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kBΒ +Β 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Celeron 1047UE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads β the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F β a 106.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 β a 189.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 159 vs 2,407, a 175.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 293 vs 11,408 (190% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 10 / 16+400% |
| Boost Clock | 1.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+229% |
| Base Clock | β | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+900% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+20380% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | Intel 7 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) |
| PassMark | 675 | 25,029+3608% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 159 | 2,407+1414% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 293 | 11,408+3794% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F β the Core i5-13400F supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1047UE) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) β the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+200% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 192 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | β |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 1047UE was priced at $100, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($100 vs $196), Celeron 1047UE was $96 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F β making the Core i5-13400F the 179.9% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-49% | $196 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 127.7+1778% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














