Celeron 7305 vs Ryzen 5 3600
Celeron 7305
Ryzen 5 3600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron 7305 is positioned at rank #890 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 7305
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 3600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 7305 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) | ✅ More affordable ($80) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-U (2022) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 7305 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+839%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) | ✅ More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 7305 and Ryzen 5 3600
Celeron 7305
The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Celeron 7305 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 117% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600. The Celeron 7305 uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 7305 scores 2,520 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 150.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 1,422 vs 9,500 (147.9% advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 641 vs 1,295, a 67.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,598 vs 1,898 (17.2% advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Celeron 7305 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 5 | 6 / 12+20% |
| Boost Clock | 1.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz+282% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-U (2022) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 2,520 | 17,685+602% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,422 | 9,500+568% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 641 | 1,295+102% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,598 | 1,898+19% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 7305 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron 7305 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Celeron 7305 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron 7305) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Alder Lake-U (Celeron 7305) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 7305) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Celeron 7305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 12th Gen), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics for 12th Gen | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 7305 launched at $128 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. At current prices ($107 vs $80), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $27 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 7305 delivers 23.6 pts/$ vs 221.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 161.5% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $128-36% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $107 | $80-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.6 | 221.1+837% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 7305 and Ryzen 5 3600
