Celeron 7305
Ryzen 7 3700X
Celeron 7305 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 7305 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 7305 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 7305
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 12th Gen, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,520 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +328.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 246.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌157% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$128 MSRP
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Celeron 7305 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 7305 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Celeron 7305?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 7305 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Celeron 7305
The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Celeron 7305 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 120% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X. The Celeron 7305 uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 7305 scores 2,520 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 159.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Celeron 7305 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 5 | 8 / 16+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1.1 GHz | 4.4 GHz+300% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 32 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-U (2022) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 2,520 | 22,430+790% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,422 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 641 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,598 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 7305 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron 7305 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Celeron 7305 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron 7305) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Alder Lake-U (Celeron 7305) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 7305) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Celeron 7305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 12th Gen), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U.
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics for 12th Gen | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 7305 was priced at $128, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($128 vs $329), Celeron 7305 was $201 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 7305 delivers 19.7 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 110.4% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 7305 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $128-61% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.7 | 68.2+246% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 7305 and Ryzen 7 3700X
