Celeron 807
VS
Sempron 140

Celeron 807 vs Sempron 140

Intel

Celeron 807

1 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Sempron 140

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 807 is positioned at rank 1141 and the Sempron 140 is on rank 864, so the Sempron 140 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 807

#1129
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3840%
#1130
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3784%
#1131
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3474%
#1132
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3458%
#1133
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3426%
#1135
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3309%
#1136
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3173%
#1137
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3168%
#1138
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3082%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
100%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
100%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
99%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
99%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
98%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
97%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
96%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
95%
#1155
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 140

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18229%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17225%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12506%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3768%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2984%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2611%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1495%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1476%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1344%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1344%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1329%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1293%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1275%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1270%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1258%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
96%
#864
Sempron 140
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
100%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
99%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
99%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
99%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
97%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
97%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
97%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
97%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
96%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
96%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
96%
#877
Pentium G3470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $130
95%
#878
Core i5-3335S
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
95%
#879
Core i5-3470T
MSRP: $184|Avg: $35
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Sempron 140 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 807 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 4.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 807Sempron 140
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sargas (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 807Sempron 140
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 807 and Sempron 140

Intel

Celeron 807

The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.

AMD

Sempron 140

The Sempron 140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 513 points. Launch price was $40.

Processing Power

The Celeron 807 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron 140's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 807 versus 2.7 GHz on the Sempron 140 — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Sempron 140 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Celeron 807 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Sempron 140 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 807 scores 535 against the Sempron 140's 513 — a 4.2% lead for the Celeron 807. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron 807 vs 0 kB on the Sempron 140.

FeatureCeleron 807Sempron 140
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
2.7 GHz+80%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
2.7 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
1.5 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark
535+4%
513
Geekbench 6 Single
292
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 807 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 140 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: QM67,QS67,HM67,HM65 (Celeron 807) and AM3,AM2+ (Sempron 140).

FeatureCeleron 807Sempron 140
Socket
BGA1023
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Sempron 140 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 807) vs AMD-V (Sempron 140). The Celeron 807 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Sempron 140 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 807 targets Mobile, Sempron 140 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Sempron 140 rivals Celeron 420.

FeatureCeleron 807Sempron 140
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile
Budget