Celeron G460 vs Core 2 Extreme X7800

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G460 vs Core 2 Extreme X7800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G460 vs Core 2 Extreme X7800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G460

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Core 2 Extreme X7800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $37 MSRP, while Core 2 Extreme X7800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.

Core 2 Extreme X7800

2007

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G460 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,138 vs 1,145).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G460 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G460 better than Core 2 Extreme X7800?

Yes. Celeron G460 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G460 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G460 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G460 is the better buy right now. Celeron G460 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $37 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G460 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G460 vs Core 2 Extreme X7800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

Core 2 Extreme X7800

The Core 2 Extreme X7800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 July 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom XE (2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,138 points. Launch price was $851.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G460 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Extreme X7800 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Extreme X7800 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme X7800 — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Extreme X7800 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron G460 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Extreme X7800 uses Merom XE (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G460 scores 1,145 against the Core 2 Extreme X7800's 1,138 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G460. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460 vs 4 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Extreme X7800.

Feature	Celeron G460	Core 2 Extreme X7800
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.6 GHz+44%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB	4 MB L2 Cache+167%
L2 Cache	256 kB	4 MB+1500%
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Merom XE (2007)
PassMark	1,145	1,138
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G460 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Extreme X7800 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G460 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Extreme X7800 — the Celeron G460 supports 59.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G460 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G460) and Socket P (Core 2 Extreme X7800).

Feature	Celeron G460	Core 2 Extreme X7800
Socket	LGA1155	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+60%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+700%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 2 Extreme X7800 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron G460 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Extreme X7800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.