
Celeron G460

Pentium G640T
Celeron G460 vs Pentium G640T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G460 vs Pentium G640T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G460 vs Pentium G640T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G460
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $27 less on MSRP ($37 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.9 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($37 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium G640T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 3 MB).
Pentium G640T
2012Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 1.5 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G460 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,139 vs 1,145).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.8 vs 30.9 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $37 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G460 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G460 better than Pentium G640T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G460 vs Pentium G640T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G460
The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

Pentium G640T
The Pentium G640T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,139 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron G460 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium G640T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G640T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G640T — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Pentium G640T (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron G460 scores 1,145 against the Pentium G640T's 1,139 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G460. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G640T.
| Feature | Celeron G460 | Pentium G640T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,145 | 1,139 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 300 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 2.0.
| Feature | Celeron G460 | Pentium G640T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G460) / not specified (Pentium G640T). The Celeron G460 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium G640T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.
| Feature | Celeron G460 | Pentium G640T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G460 was priced at $37, while the Pentium G640T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($37 vs $64), Celeron G460 was $27 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G460 delivers 30.9 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the Pentium G640T — making the Celeron G460 the 54% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G460 | Pentium G640T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $37-42% | $64 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.9+74% | 17.8 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














