Celeron G470 vs Core i7-9700K

Intel

Celeron G470

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G470 vs Core i7-9700K Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G470 vs Core i7-9700K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G470 vs Core i7-9700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G470

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $350 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (1,225 vs 14,397).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 12 MB).

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +654.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +700% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 1000% HIGHER MSRP
    $385 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Celeron G470?
Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 654.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1075.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 654.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1075.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 1.5 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in 1000.0% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $35 MSRP, and it still gives you a 654.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 6.8% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 35.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013), 700% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 1.5 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G470 vs Core i7-9700K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Processing Power

The Celeron G470 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 7 more cores. The Core i7-9700K is built on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G470 scores 1,225 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 168.6% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G470 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.

FeatureCeleron G470Core i7-9700K
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
8 / 8+700%
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.6 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache
12 MB (total)+700%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark
1,225
14,397+1075%
Geekbench 6 Single
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G470 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K — the Core i7-9700K supports 150.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G470) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).

FeatureCeleron G470Core i7-9700K
Socket
LGA1155
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR4-2666+150%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
128 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G470) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G470) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G470 targets Budget, Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureCeleron G470Core i7-9700K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G470 was priced at $35, while the Core i7-9700K came in at $385. On launch pricing ($35 vs $385), Celeron G470 was $350 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G470 delivers 35.0 pts/$ vs 37.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Core i7-9700K the 6.6% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G470Core i7-9700K
MSRP
$35-91%
$385
Performance per Dollar
35.0
37.4+7%
Release Date
2013
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.