Celeron G470 vs Phenom X3 8650

Celeron G470 vs Phenom X3 8650 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G470

1 / 2

1,225

+0.6%

1,218

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G470 vs Phenom X3 8650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G470 vs Phenom X3 8650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G470

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Phenom X3 8650 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 2 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $35 MSRP, while Phenom X3 8650 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom X3 8650

2008

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G470 across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,218 vs 1,225).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G470 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G470 better than Phenom X3 8650?

Yes. Celeron G470 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G470 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G470 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G470 is the better buy right now. Celeron G470 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $35 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (35.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G470 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G470 vs Phenom X3 8650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom X3 8650

The Phenom X3 8650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,218 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G470 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X3 8650 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8650 has 2 more cores. The Phenom X3 8650 is built on the Toliman (2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G470 scores 1,225 against the Phenom X3 8650's 1,218 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G470. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G470 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8650.

Feature	Celeron G470	Phenom X3 8650
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	3 / 3+200%
Boost Clock	—	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache	2 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	—	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	—	Toliman (2008)
PassMark	1,225	1,218
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X3 8650 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G470	Phenom X3 8650
Socket	LGA1155	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G470) / not specified (Phenom X3 8650). The Celeron G470 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Phenom X3 8650 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.